Andreessen’s claim: Outrage cycles aren’t a modern invention—they’re an old reflex, now running at internet speed. What’s really changed is how fast and public it all is.
Andreessen draws a sharp line between what’s reported and what actually matters: 'the news is called the news, not the importance.' He traces today’s viral outrage to CNN’s 24-hour 'randemonium'—the relentless hunt for the 'current thing,' no matter how trivial. The internet, he says, has only cranked this up, turning every event into a meme that explodes for two and a half days before vanishing. Despite the endless online tribal warfare, actual political violence in the West is at historic lows—unlike the duels, riots, and labor strikes of the past.
The Jesse Smollett case, for Andreessen, shows how facts barely matter in these cycles; what matters is how quickly people split into moral tribes. The real shift isn’t in our appetite for conflict, but in the medium and speed: 'If it’s on the internet, it’s a viral social media meme.' The era from the Cold War to 2014, he argues, was an anomaly of 'suppressed volatility,' with centralized media muting the natural chaos of public discourse. Now, with the internet, we’re back to the historical norm—just with fewer broken noses and more broken comment sections.